Letters of intent may be advanced in the world of commercial real estate. In some specific domestic markets (for example in principal to principal deals between upstream Petroleum traders and producers in the same country, or certain Joint venture projects) they may be found. But there is no underlying and supported standard international application for the Letter of Intent.
"Parties to a transaction sometimes intentionally create a letter of intent as an expression of what they intend to agree upon should certain circumstances arise... [whatever happens], the document will not be binding and thus not enforceable until those circumstances arise. Thus, the letter of intent is essentially a legally worthless document. It is not clear to me the reason any party would ever bother to create such a document and yet I have seen it used on many occasions. If parties to a transaction intend to bind each other, then they should create a binding contract, not a letter of intent. If the parties to a transaction do not intend to bind each other, then why bother creating a document that is not binding?